My Highest Conviction Ideas for the Second Half of 2023

With so much going on in the economy and the markets right now, my preferred investment strategy is to focus on a few ideas with high conviction rather than spreading my attention too thin with a broader approach. A high conviction idea to me is an idea I am willing to commit more time to researching and more capital to in the portfolio.

Going forward this year my two highest conviction investments are uranium and natural gas. It is incredibly hard to time anything in the markets and at the top of the list of difficulty is commodities. They are often counter trend plays that can sometimes lag the economy or precede big moves of the S&P 500.

A lesson I have learned from over a decade in the market is investing is never a sure bet; the best you can do is stack the odds as far in your favour as possible and wait for signs that you are correct.

Uranium

This has been on our radar for over a year now and it seems to be finally looking ready to blast off. We started a position in Feb 2021 and so far it is up 80.23%. In our view however this could just be the pregame stretch.

Why?

The world needs more power and there are a few billion people who want a quality of life closer to that which is experienced in wealthy countries. This requires energy; people are not likely to agree to live in a situation where their options are limited because it isn’t windy, or it has been cloudy for a few days.

Source: https://www.cameco.com/invest/markets/supply-demand

This increase in demand combined with the unintended consequences of ESG policy over the last 10 years has created a record amount of coal being used in places like Germany and California. Nuclear is the cleanest and most dense source of energy available and compared to the rising use of coal, it seems like a no-brainer. Reactors have started to make a comeback in Asia and the Middle East with China currently leading this adoption with 19 reactors under construction.

Source: https://www.cameco.com/invest/markets/supply-demand

Uranium has been trading below the cost to produce it for years and the over supply is eroding. There are now physical trusts (U.UN) that are scooping pounds off the market and the energy companies are competing for pounds more than in recent history. When the supply glut runs out, this could be a huge move! Even if the price of uranium were to increase 10x from here, it is still such a small price compared to the billions to bring the reactors online that it almost doesn’t matter.

The investment I am using to try to benefit from this idea is U.UN.

Natural Gas

Natural gas requires a huge warning when discussing; people who trade commodities call it the widow-maker because of the huge counter intuitive moves it can make. The upside for this idea is seated in the energy argument along with a few others.

There is a huge spread between natural gas in the EU (10.11) and in the US (2.77) and as these two partitioned gas “economies” connect the price will move in theory to land somewhere in the middle. There is seasonality at play here too that helps as historically the price rises in the fall.

How am I wrong?

Uranium: If energy demand doesn’t continue to rise, this thesis will not play out. If there is another unfortunate event at a newish reactor, demand will fall off a cliff for safety reasons.

Natural Gas: If it acts like natural gas and defies reason, this might not win. Careful.

Good luck trading! (These are not recommendations. Look into these two ideas yourself! This is just what I am doing.)

Much Ado About Oil

Fossil fuels touch almost every part of our lives from energy production, as an input of a product, and a primary means through which everything is transported. Cosmetics, plastics, fertilizers, fuel, cleaning products and clothing represent only a few of the goods made directly with oil. In the last 150 years peteroleum products have revolutionized how almost everything is done resulting in an ever increasing need for oil.

Currently in Canada we consume approximately 1047 gallons per person per year. Many other large nations, India and China for example, remain far behind this number but are catching up quickly. These two countries at 51.4 gallons and 137.8 gallons respectively will only continue to increase their consumption as their GDP continues to rise and their citizens begin to enjoy a higher quality of life.

Energy is essential for growth and prosperity, but it comes at a steep price paid by the environment and our public health. These issues need to be addressed but unfortunately it is not reasonable to turn off oil before there is something viable to replace it. Currently many countries that have jettisoned fossil fuel sovereignty for dreams of becoming greener are paying for that choice. Germany is at the forefront of this energy crisis having shut down nuclear plants in favour of relying heavily on solar and wind power. Ironically unless they abandon plans to close their reactors down, they will be burning coal for the next two years to offset their energy woes. This story is ripping through Europe with France as the exception.

Why is there a problem?

We have under invested in energy creation in the last ten years. It has been seen as undersirable and harmful to have E & P companies on the investment sheets of funds and ETFs not only due to its bad reputation but also because the cost of capital has been much higher for companies because of ESG regulations. This is simple supply and demand; demand will continue to grow and supply is far behind and slow to adjust.

It can’t go higher because it will break everything!

Currently oil is high but if adjusted for inflation, it doesn’t seem so extreme. It is hard to not just see the pump price and compare to past prices, but what doesn’t usually factor in people’s thinking is what the purchasing power of their dollars was when oil/gas was lower. Even near $100/barrel, we are not that close to “all time highs”; oil can go much higher before anything breaks.

How am I wrong?

Knowing what will destroy your thesis is crucial to not blowing up your trading account. One way my forecast will be incorrect is if there is a large and long recession in the US and Canada. A short-lived recession will not be enough to destroy demand to a level where there is extra supply. Even emptying the SPR (Strategic Petroleum Reserve) to its lowest level in 30+ years could not stabilize supply and demand.

Prediction:

WTI will be $125 by Christmas and $150 by March 2023.

Oil companies, leaps on oil ETF and the same for uranium is how I am playing this.